Eating lettuce three times worse for the environment than eating bacon…

veg bacon

Turns out you really don’t make friends with salad.

US scientists have released a new study which claims eating salad is worse for the environment than eating meat.

The new research from Carnegie Mellon University — published in the journal Environment Systems and Decisions — states current recommendations to incorporate more fruits, vegetables, dairy and seafood in a diet could be worse for the environment.

Composite of bacon and lettuce
 Photo: Diets where meat is replaced with fruit and vegetables could do more harm to the environment, a new study finds.

Key points

  • New study looked at water, energy and greenhouse gases used to produce food
  • Study used three diet scenarios and how they impacted the environment
  • Vegetables required more resources per calorie to produce on to the plate

The study measured energy use, how much water is needed and greenhouse gas emissions right the way through the food chain.

It used the US dietary guidelines to look at a shift from current food consumption patterns to three dietary scenarios and how that impacted the environment.

Researchers looked at how growing, processing and transporting food, sales and service, and household storage could impact the environment.

Researcher Paul Fischbeck said eating lettuce was three times worse for greenhouse gas emission than eating bacon.

“Lots of common vegetables require more resources per calorie than you would think,” he said.

“Eggplant, celery and cucumbers look particularly bad when compared to pork or chicken.”

In the first scenario, the impact of food production on the environment could be lessened if people simply ate less of what they already do. Shifting from a high-calorie diet to a reduced calorie diet – that path found a 9 per cent decrease in energy use, water footprint and emissions.

The second scenario involved maintaining calorie intake, but adjusting foods to incorporate more fruits, vegetables, dairy and seafood. That scenario would see an increase of 43 per cent in energy, 16 per cent in water footprint and emission rise by 11 per cent.

The third scenario took the greatest toll on the environment, where calories were reduced and switched to a diet with more vegetables and less meat. That resulted in 38 per cent increase in energy, 10 per cent in water footprint and 6 per cent in gas emissions.

The researchers claimed there was “a complex relationship between diet and the environment”.

“What is good for us health-wise isn’t always what’s best for the environment,” the study revealed.

“That is important for public officials to know and for them to be cognisant of these tradeoffs as they develop or continue to develop dietary guidelines in the future.”

The study has become an interesting turn for “bacon lovers”, after the World Health Organisation warned processed meats like bacon, sausages and hot dogs caused colon cancer.

Critics of the new study said the research only looked at “calorie-for-calorie” comparison, for example 100 calories of bacon, versus 100 calories of lettuce.


1 Comment

  1. Quite honestly this is complete rubbish. The universities are so corrupt. Many won’t get sponsorships unless they tell the lies. Meat farming, if you want to call it that, I prefer to use absolute cruelty, will do anything to prevent the general public know or make them aware of what they are doing. A veg or vegan diet is much more environmentally friendly and cruelty free. If this is not enough what else is.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s