Global Warming Hoax destroyed by Nobel Laureate…

The Dogs Breakfast Of News



Close to 32,000 scientists signed this petition stating that the Global warming story line is total rubbish.  Mass psychology clearly illustrates that if the masses believe in something, that one should approach that topic with caution. Translation; if the masses accept something like the Gospel; the chances are that its pure crap and you need to avoid it like the plague. Global warming is nothing but a scam perpetrated by the rich to rob the poor.

Dr Ivar Giaever, a Nobel Prize-Winner for physics in 1973 states that Global warming a non-problem

If scientists don’t believe in this hypothesis, and they have the credentials to understand the theory behind these claims, then logic dictates that a rational individual should take the same route.  The main players here are corporations and politicians.  Politicians are nothing but paid corporate prostitutes, therefore, the only time you can trust these two groups is…

View original post 295 more words


1 Comment

  1. The criteria established by the Global Warming Petition Project’s organizers were absurd. My neighbor, a computer scientist with a Bachelor’s of Science degree who has read maybe two or three peer-reviewed climate studies, would be considered equal in knowledge and experience to a climatologist or atmospheric chemist who has a PhD and has studied climate for his or her entire career. Yet even using those absurd criteria, the GWPP signatures represent 0.25% of the people who could have signed the Petition, 0.44% of the people worked in the GWPP’s identified fields as of 2013. And even biasing the criteria as much as possible in favor of the GWPP’s signers, the signatures represent a small minority of the US memberships of the American Meteorological Society (5.9%), the American Geophysical Union (7.5%), the American Physical Society (10.5%), the American Chemical Society(4.2%), and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1.4%). (

    Tiny minorities blown out of proportion and gathered using statistically invalid methods don’t disprove the fact that every authentic scientific study performed to date has found a consensus (90% or more) among climate scientists that industrial climate disruption is real, rests on 200 years of scientific theory, and supported by overwhelming evidence.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s